Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Research Outputs
  • Projects
  • Explore by
    • Organizations
    • Researchers
    • Research Outputs
    • Projects
  • Academic & Publications
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. Scholars Hub of the Academia Sinica
  2. Research Outputs

Browsing by Author


Jump to:
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Showing results 1 to 17 of 17
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)RelationscopusWOSFulltext/Archive link
2016Dualisation within liberalisation The Transformation of the Corporate Pension System in JapanChung-Yang Yeh 
2016Exploring Patterns of Public-Private Pension Mix in East AsiaYeh, Chung-Yang ; Shi, S.-J.
-In-Work Poverty in three East Asian Welfare StatesChung-Yang Yeh Handbook of In-Work Poverty (Cheltenham : Edward Elgar)
2016Mechanisms and Patterns of In-work Poverty in Japan and TaiwanYeh, Chung-Yang 
2016Rebirth and Transformation of Bismarckian and Beveridge Models: Exploring the Changing Governance of Pension Reforms in East AsiaShih-Jiunn SHI; Chung-Yang YEH 
2016The Political Logic of the Training-based ALMPs System in TaiwanYeh, Chung-Yang ; Ku, Yuen-wen
-Varieties of East Asian Productivist Welfare Regime? Korea and Taiwan in ComparisonYeh, Chung-Yang Asian Journal of Social Science
2016一個抉擇:台灣需要什麼樣的教育與技術形成體系葉崇揚 新藍圖、新活路:台灣新經濟模式倡議 (台北 : 新境界文教基金會)
2016台灣工作貧窮圖像 這是一個低薪還是非典型工作的問題?葉崇揚 
2017台灣工作貧窮的機制與政策思考葉崇揚 ; 施世駿社会政策研究 2017(2), 35-54
-文化趨同或是政經殊異? -兩岸三地福利改革的比較探析施世駿; 葉崇揚 ; 古允文社會政策與社會工作期刊
2017文化趨同或是政經殊異?兩岸三地福利改革的比較探析施世駿; 葉崇揚 ; 古允文Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences 49
2016社会投资福利国家? 论当代社会救助政策逻辑的转变葉崇揚 中国公共政策评论 10, 1-23
2015社會投資福利國家:論當代社會救助政策邏輯的轉變葉崇揚 
2016自由化?雙元化?日本企業年金體系的制度轉型葉崇揚 
2016行動者的失敗?或是結構的限制? -台灣勞工退休金改革的再辯證葉崇揚 人文及社會科學集刊 第28卷第4期,頁541-580
2015行動者的失敗?或是結構的限制?─台灣勞工退休金改革的再辯證葉崇揚 
Showing results 1 to 17 of 17
Explore by
  • Academic & Publications
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Research Outputs
  • Projects
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback